Web
and Book design, |
Click
Here to return to |
VISITORS
I THINK that I love
society as much as
most, and am ready enough to fasten myself like a bloodsucker for the
time to
any full-blooded man that comes in my way. I am naturally no hermit,
but might
possibly sit out the sturdiest frequenter of the bar-room, if my
business
called me thither. I had three chairs in my
house; one for solitude, two for friendship, three for society. When
visitors
came in larger and unexpected numbers there was but the third chair for
them
all, but they generally economized the room by standing up. It is
surprising
how many great men and women a small house will contain. I have had
twenty-five
or thirty souls, with their bodies, at once under my roof, and yet we
often
parted without being aware that we had come very near to one another.
Many of
our houses, both public and private, with their almost innumerable
apartments,
their huge halls and their cellars for the storage of wines and other
munitions
of peace, appear to be extravagantly large for their inhabitants. They
are so
vast and magnificent that the latter seem to be only vermin which
infest
them. I am surprised when the herald blows his summons before
some
Tremont
or Astor or Middlesex House, to see come creeping out over the piazza
for all
inhabitants a ridiculous mouse, which soon again slinks into some hole
in the
pavement. One inconvenience I
sometimes experienced in so small a house, the difficulty of getting to
a
sufficient distance from my guest when we began to utter the big
thoughts in
big words. You want room for your thoughts to get into sailing trim and
run a
course or two before they make their port. The bullet of your thought
must have
overcome its lateral and ricochet motion and fallen into its last and
steady
course before it reaches the ear of the hearer, else it may plow out
again
through the side of his head. Also, our sentences wanted room to unfold
and
form their columns in the interval. Individuals, like nations, must
have
suitable broad and natural boundaries, even a considerable neutral
ground,
between them. I have found it a singular luxury to talk across the pond
to a
companion on the opposite side. In my house we were so near that we
could not
begin to hear — we could not speak low enough to be heard; as
when you throw
two stones into calm water so near that they break each other's
undulations. If
we are merely loquacious and loud talkers, then we can afford to stand
very
near together, cheek by jowl, and feel each other's breath; but if we
speak
reservedly and thoughtfully, we want to be farther apart, that all
animal heat
and moisture may have a chance to evaporate. If we would enjoy the most
intimate society with that in each of us which is without, or above,
being
spoken to, we must not only be silent, but commonly so far apart bodily
that we
cannot possibly hear each other's voice in any case. Referred to this
standard,
speech is for the convenience of those who are hard of hearing; but
there are
many fine things which we cannot say if we have to shout. As the
conversation
began to assume a loftier and grander tone, we gradually shoved our
chairs
farther apart till they touched the wall in opposite corners, and then
commonly
there was not room enough. My "best" room,
however, my withdrawing room, always ready for company, on whose carpet
the sun
rarely fell, was the pine wood behind my house. Thither in summer days,
when
distinguished guests came, I took them, and a priceless domestic swept
the
floor and dusted the furniture and kept the things in order. If one guest came he
sometimes partook of my frugal meal, and it was no interruption to
conversation
to be stirring a hasty-pudding, or watching the rising and maturing of
a loaf
of bread in the ashes, in the meanwhile. But if twenty came and sat in
my house
there was nothing said about dinner, though there might be bread enough
for
two, more than if eating were a forsaken habit; but we naturally
practised
abstinence; and this was never felt to be an offence against
hospitality, but
the most proper and considerate course. The waste and decay of physical
life,
which so often needs repair, seemed miraculously retarded in such a
case, and
the vital vigor stood its ground. I could entertain thus a thousand as
well as
twenty; and if any ever went away disappointed or hungry from my house
when
they found me at home, they may depend upon it that I sympathized with
them at
least. So easy is it, though many housekeepers doubt it, to establish
new and
better customs in the place of the old. You need not rest your
reputation on
the dinners you give. For my own part, I was never so
effectually
deterred
from frequenting a man's house, by any kind of Cerberus whatever,
as by the parade
one made about dining me, which I took to be a very polite and
roundabout hint
never to trouble him so again. I think I shall never revisit those
scenes. I
should be proud to have for the motto of my cabin those lines of
Spenser which
one of my visitors inscribed on a yellow walnut leaf for a
card:
—
When Winslow, afterward
governor of the Plymouth Colony, went with a companion on a visit of
ceremony
to Massasoit on foot through the woods, and arrived tired and hungry at
his
lodge, they were well received by the king, but nothing was said about
eating
that day. When the night arrived, to quote their own words —
"He
laid us
on the bed with himself and his wife, they at the one end and we at the
other,
it being only planks laid a foot from the ground and a thin mat upon
them. Two
more of his chief men, for want of room, pressed by and upon us; so
that we were
worse weary of our lodging than of our journey." At one o'clock the
next
day Massasoit "brought two fishes that he had shot," about thrice as
big as a bream. "These being boiled, there were at least forty looked
for
a share in them; the most eat of them. This meal only we had in two
nights and
a day; and had not one of us bought a partridge, we had taken our
journey
fasting." Fearing that they would be light-headed for want of food and
also sleep, owing to "the savages' barbarous singing, (for they use to
sing themselves asleep,)" and that they might get home while they had
strength to travel, they departed. As for lodging, it is true they were
but
poorly entertained, though what they found an inconvenience was no
doubt
intended for an honor; but as far as eating was concerned, I do not see
how the
Indians could have done better. They had nothing to eat themselves, and
they
were wiser than to think that apologies could supply the place of food
to their
guests; so they drew their belts tighter and said nothing about it.
Another
time when Winslow visited them, it being a season of plenty with them,
there
was no deficiency in this respect. As for men, they will hardly
fail one anywhere. I had more visitors while I lived in the woods than
at any
other period in my life; I mean that I had some. I met several there
under more
favorable circumstances than I could anywhere else. But fewer came to
see me on
trivial business. In this respect, my company was winnowed by my mere
distance
from town. I had withdrawn so far within the great ocean of solitude,
into
which the rivers of society empty, that for the most part, so far as my
needs
were concerned, only the finest sediment was deposited around me.
Beside, there
were wafted to me evidences of unexplored and uncultivated continents
on the
other side. Who should come to my lodge this morning but a true Homeric or Paphlagonian man — he had so suitable and poetic a name that I am sorry I cannot print it here — a Canadian, a woodchopper and post-maker, who can hole fifty posts in a day, who made his last supper on a woodchuck which his dog caught. He, too, has heard of Homer, and, "if it were not for books," would "not know what to do rainy days," though perhaps he has not read one wholly through for many rainy seasons. Some priest who could pronounce the Greek itself taught him to read his verse in the Testament in his native parish far away; and now I must translate to him, while he holds the book, Achilles' reproof to Patroclus for his sad countenance. "Why are you in tears, Patroclus, like a young girl?" —
He says, "That's
good." He has a great bundle of white oak bark under his arm for a sick
man, gathered this Sunday morning. "I suppose there's no harm in going
after such a thing to-day," says he. To him Homer was a great writer,
though
what his writing was about he did not know. A more simple and natural
man it
would be hard to find. Vice and disease, which cast such a sombre moral
hue
over the world, seemed to have hardly any existance for him. He was
about
twenty-eight years old, and had left Canada and his father's house a
dozen
years before to work in the States, and earn money to buy a farm with
at last,
perhaps in his native country. He was cast in the coarsest mould; a
stout but
sluggish body, yet gracefully carried, with a thick sunburnt neck, dark
bushy
hair, and dull sleepy blue eyes, which were occasionally lit up with
expression. He wore a flat gray cloth cap, a dingy wool-colored
greatcoat, and
cowhide boots. He was a great consumer of meat, usually carrying his
dinner to
his work a couple of miles past my house — for he chopped all
summer — in a tin
pail; cold meats, often cold woodchucks, and coffee in a stone bottle
which
dangled by a string from his belt; and sometimes he offered me a drink.
He came
along early, crossing my bean-field, though without anxiety or haste to
get to
his work, such as Yankees exhibit. He wasn't a-going to hurt himself.
He didn't
care if he only earned his board. Frequently he would leave his dinner
in the
bushes, when his dog had caught a woodchuck by the way, and go back a
mile and
a half to dress it and leave it in the cellar of the house where he
boarded,
after deliberating first for half an hour whether he could not sink it
in the
pond safely till nightfall — loving to dwell long upon these
themes. He would
say, as he went by in the morning, "How thick the pigeons are! If
working
every day were not my trade, I could get all the meat I should want by
hunting-pigeons, woodchucks, rabbits, partridges — by gosh! I
could get all I
should want for a week in one day." He was a skilful chopper,
and indulged in some flourishes and ornaments in his art. He cut his
trees
level and close to the ground, that the sprouts which came up afterward
might
be more vigorous and a sled might slide over the stumps; and instead of
leaving
a whole tree to support his corded wood, he would pare it away to a
slender
stake or splinter which you could break off with your hand at last. He interested me because he
was so quiet and solitary and so happy withal; a well of good humor and
contentment which overflowed at his eyes. His mirth was without alloy.
Sometimes I saw him at his work in the woods, felling trees, and he
would greet
me with a laugh of inexpressible satisfaction, and a salutation in
Canadian
French, though he spoke English as well. When I approached him he would
suspend
his work, and with half-suppressed mirth lie along the trunk of a pine
which he
had felled, and, peeling off the inner bark, roll it up into a ball and
chew it
while he laughed and talked. Such an exuberance of animal spirits had
he that
he sometimes tumbled down and rolled on the ground with laughter at
anything
which made him think and tickled him. Looking round upon the trees he
would
exclaim — "By George! I can enjoy myself well enough here
chopping; I want
no better sport." Sometimes, when at leisure, he amused himself all day
in
the woods with a pocket pistol, firing salutes to himself at regular
intervals
as he walked. In the winter he had a fire by which at noon he warmed
his coffee
in a kettle; and as he sat on a log to eat his dinner the chickadees
would
sometimes come round and alight on his arm and peck at the potato in
his
fingers; and he said that he "liked to have the little fellers
about him." In him the animal man
chiefly was developed. In physical endurance and contentment he was
cousin to
the pine and the rock. I asked him once if he was not sometimes tired
at night,
after working all day; and he answered, with a sincere and serious
look,
"Gorrappit, I never was tired in my life." But the intellectual and
what is called spiritual man in him were slumbering as in an infant. He
had
been instructed only in that innocent and ineffectual way in which the
Catholic
priests teach the aborigines, by which the pupil is never educated to
the
degree of consciousness, but only to the degree of trust and reverence,
and a
child is not made a man, but kept a child. When Nature made him, she
gave him a
strong body and contentment for his portion, and propped him on every
side with
reverence and reliance, that he might live out his threescore years and
ten a
child. He was so genuine and unsophisticated that no introduction would
serve
to introduce him, more than if you introduced a woodchuck to your
neighbor. He
had got to find him out as you did. He would not play any part. Men
paid him
wages for work, and so helped to feed and clothe him; but he never
exchanged
opinions with them. He was so simply and naturally humble —
if he
can be called
humble who never aspires — that humility was no distinct
quality
in him, nor could
he conceive of it. Wiser men were demigods to him. If you told him that
such a
one was coming, he did as if he thought that anything so grand would
expect
nothing of himself, but take all the responsibility on itself, and let
him be
forgotten still. He never heard the sound of praise. He particularly
reverenced
the writer and the preacher. Their performances were miracles. When I
told him
that I wrote considerably, he thought for a long time that it was
merely the
handwriting which I meant, for he could write a remarkably good hand
himself. I
sometimes found the name of his native parish handsomely written in the
snow by
the highway, with the proper French accent, and knew that he had
passed. I
asked him if he ever wished to write his thoughts. He said that he had
read and
written letters for those who could not, but he never tried to write
thoughts —
no, he could not, he could not tell what to put first, it would kill
him, and
then there was spelling to be attended to at the same time! I heard that a distinguished
wise man and reformer asked him if he did not want the world to be
changed; but
he answered with a chuckle of surprise in his Canadian accent, not
knowing that
the question had ever been entertained before, "No, I like it well
enough."
It would have suggested many things to a philosopher to have dealings
with him.
To a stranger he appeared to know nothing of things in general; yet I
sometimes
saw in him a man whom I had not seen before, and I did not know whether
he was
as wise as Shakespeare or as simply ignorant as a child, whether to
suspect him
of a fine poetic consciousness or of stupidity. A townsman told me that
when he
met him sauntering through the village in his small close-fitting cap,
and
whistling to himself, he reminded him of a prince in disguise. His only books were an
almanac and an arithmetic, in which last he was considerably expert.
The former
was a sort of cyclopaedia to him, which he supposed to contain an
abstract of
human knowledge, as indeed it does to a considerable extent. I loved to
sound
him on the various reforms of the day, and he never failed to look at
them in
the most simple and practical light. He had never heard of such things
before.
Could he do without factories? I asked. He had worn the home-made
Vermont gray,
he said, and that was good. Could he dispense with tea and coffee? Did
this
country afford any beverage beside water? He had soaked hemlock leaves
in water
and drank it, and thought that was better than water in warm
weather. When
I asked him if he could do without money, he showed the convenience of
money in
such a way as to suggest and coincide with the most philosophical
accounts of
the origin of this institution, and the very derivation of the word pecunia.
If an ox were his property, and he wished to get needles and thread at
the
store, he thought it would be inconvenient and impossible soon to go on
mortgaging some portion of the creature each time to that amount. He
could
defend many institutions better than any philosopher, because, in
describing them
as they concerned him, he gave the true reason for their prevalence,
and
speculation had not suggested to him any other. At another time,
hearing
Plato's definition of a man — a biped without feathers
—
and that one exhibited
a cock plucked and called it Plato's man, he thought it an important
difference
that the knees
bent the wrong way. He would sometimes exclaim,
"How
I love to talk! By George, I could talk all day!" I asked him once,
when I
had not seen him for many months, if he had got a new idea this summer.
"Good Lord" — said he, "a man that has to work as I do, if he
does not forget the ideas he has had, he will do well. May be the man
you hoe
with is inclined to race; then, by gorry, your mind must be there; you
think of
weeds." He would sometimes ask me first on such occasions, if I had
made
any improvement. One winter day I asked him if he was always satisfied
with
himself, wishing to suggest a substitute within him for the priest
without, and
some higher motive for living. "Satisfied!" said he; "some men
are satisfied with one thing, and some with another. One man, perhaps,
if he
has got enough, will be satisfied to sit all day with his back to the
fire and
his belly to the table, by George!" Yet I never, by any manoeuvring,
could
get him to take the spiritual view of things; the highest that he
appeared to
conceive of was a simple expediency, such as you might expect an animal
to
appreciate; and this, practically, is true of most men. If I suggested
any
improvement in his mode of life, he merely answered, without expressing
any
regret, that it was too late. Yet he thoroughly believed in honesty and
the
like virtues. There was a certain positive
originality, however slight, to be detected in him, and I occasionally
observed
that he was thinking for himself and expressing his own opinion, a
phenomenon
so rare that I would any day walk ten miles to observe it, and it
amounted to
the re-origination of many of the institutions of society. Though he
hesitated,
and perhaps failed to express himself distinctly, he always had a
presentable
thought behind. Yet his thinking was so primitive and immersed in his
animal
life, that, though more promising than a merely learned man's, it
rarely
ripened to anything which can be reported. He suggested that there
might be men
of genius in the lowest grades of life, however permanently humble and
illiterate, who take their own view always, or do not pretend to see at
all;
who are as bottomless even as Walden Pond was thought to be, though
they may be
dark and muddy. Many a traveller came out of
his way to see me and the inside of my house, and, as an excuse for
calling,
asked for a glass of water. I told them that I drank at the pond, and
pointed
thither, offering to lend them a dipper. Far off as I lived, I was not
exempted
from the annual visitation which occurs, methinks, about the first of
April,
when everybody is on the move; and I had my share of good luck, though
there
were some curious specimens among my visitors. Half-witted men from the
almshouse and elsewhere came to see me; but I endeavored to make them
exercise
all the wit they had, and make their confessions to me; in such cases
making
wit the theme of our conversation; and so was compensated. Indeed, I
found some
of them to be wiser than the so-called overseers
of the poor
and
selectmen of the town, and thought it was time that the tables were
turned.
With respect to wit, I learned that there was not much difference
between the
half and the whole. One day, in particular, an inoffensive,
simple-minded pauper,
whom with others I had often seen used as fencing stuff, standing or
sitting on
a bushel in the fields to keep cattle and himself from straying,
visited me,
and expressed a wish to live as I did. He told me, with the utmost
simplicity
and truth, quite superior, or rather inferior,
to anything that
is
called humility, that he was "deficient in intellect." These were his
words. The Lord had made him so, yet he supposed the Lord cared as much
for him
as for another. "I have always been so," said he, "from my
childhood; I never had much mind; I was not like other children; I am
weak in
the head. It was the Lord's will, I suppose." And there he was to prove
the truth of his words. He was a metaphysical puzzle to me. I have
rarely met a
fellowman on such promising ground — it was so simple and
sincere
and so true
all that he said. And, true enough, in proportion as he appeared to
humble
himself was he exalted. I did not know at first but it was the result
of a wise
policy. It seemed that from such a basis of truth and frankness as the
poor
weak-headed pauper had laid, our intercourse might go forward to
something
better than the intercourse of sages. I had some guests from those
not reckoned commonly among the town's poor, but who should be; who are
among
the world's poor, at any rate; guests who appeal, not to your
hospitality, but
to your hospitalality;
who earnestly wish to be helped, and
preface
their appeal with the information that they are resolved, for one
thing, never
to help themselves. I require of a visitor that he be not actually
starving,
though he may have the very best appetite in the world, however he got
it.
Objects of charity are not guests. Men who did not know when their
visit had
terminated, though I went about my business again, answering them from
greater
and greater remoteness. Men of almost every degree of wit
called
on me in
the migrating season. Some who had more wits than they knew what to do
with;
runaway slaves with plantation manners, who listened from time to time,
like
the fox in the fable, as if they heard the hounds a-baying on their
track, and
looked at me beseechingly, as much as to say, —
"O
Christian, will you
send me back?"
One real runaway slave,
among the rest, whom I helped to forward toward the north star. Men of
one idea,
like a hen with one chicken, and that a duckling; men of a thousand
ideas, and
unkempt heads, like those hens which are made to take charge of a
hundred
chickens, all in pursuit of one bug, a score of them lost in every
morning's
dew — and become frizzled and mangy in consequence; men of
ideas
instead of
legs, a sort of intellectual centipede that made you crawl all over.
One man
proposed a book in which visitors should write their names, as at the
White
Mountains; but, alas! I have too good a memory to make that necessary. I could not but notice some
of the peculiarities of my visitors. Girls and boys and young women
generally
seemed glad to be in the woods. They looked in the pond and at the
flowers, and
improved their time. Men of business, even farmers, thought only of
solitude
and employment, and of the great distance at which I dwelt from
something or
other; and though they said that they loved a ramble in the woods
occasionally,
it was obvious that they did not. Restless committed men, whose time
was all
taken up in getting a living or keeping it; ministers who spoke of God
as if
they enjoyed a monopoly of the subject, who could not bear all kinds of
opinions; doctors, lawyers, uneasy housekeepers who pried into my
cupboard and
bed when I was out — how came Mrs. — to know that
my sheets
were not as clean
as hers? — young men who had ceased to be young, and had
concluded that it was
safest to follow the beaten track of the professions
— all these
generally said that it was not possible to do
so much
good in my position. Ay! there was the rub. The old and infirm and the
timid,
of whatever age or sex, thought most of sickness, and sudden accident
and
death; to them life seemed full of danger — what danger is
there
if you don't
think of any? — and they thought that a prudent man
would
carefully select
the safest position, where Dr. B. might be on hand at a moment's
warning. To
them the village was literally a com-munity,
a league for
mutual
defence, and you would suppose that they would not go a-huckleberrying
without
a medicine chest. The amount of it is, if a man is alive, there is
always danger
that he may die, though the danger must be allowed to be less in
proportion as
he is dead-and-alive to begin with. A man sits as many risks as he
runs. Finally,
there were the self-styled reformers, the greatest bores of all, who
thought that
I was forever singing, —
but
they
did not know
that
the third line was,
I did not
fear the
hen-harriers, for I kept no chickens; but I feared the men-harriers
rather.
I had more cheering visitors than the last. Children come a-berrying, railroad men taking a Sunday morning walk in clean shirts, fishermen and hunters, poets and philosophers; in short, all honest pilgrims, who came out to the woods for freedom's sake, and really left the village behind, I was ready to greet with — "Welcome, Englishmen! welcome, Englishmen!" for I had had communication with that race. |