Web
and Book design, Copyright, Kellscraft Studio 1999-2007 (Return to Web Text-ures) |
Click
Here to return to Field Days in California Content Page Return to the Previous Chapter |
(HOME) |
AN EXCITING
FORENOON IT is with
birds as
with places and people; some are endeared to us by one quality, and
some by a
different or even an opposite quality. The phalaropes are trustful.
They swim
about us almost within hand’s reach; we like them for that. Other birds
are
wary to the last degree; we must match our wits against theirs, or we
shall
never have them within comfortable eye-reach; and we like them for
that, and
pursue them the harder. And others, a few, are never so highly
appreciated as
when we gaze at them afar off. Such are the common carrion-eating
vultures,
turkey-buzzards we call them; almost disgusting near at hand, but
miracles of
grace as they float in wide circles far above us under the great blue
dome. For me,
and I
suppose for every one, there is a peculiar satisfaction in coming
unexpectedly
close upon any shy creature, be it larger or smaller, bird or beast.
Thus I
recall my sensations a year ago when after standing a long time
motionless on
the brim of a deep, steeply walled cañon, admiring one of the most
beautiful of
all our Santa Barbara prospects, I heard something stir just below me,
and the
next instant saw a wildcat emerge from the chaparral and, oblivious of
my
proximity, though there was nothing but the air between us, mount a
boulder
like the one I was myself standing on, and look leisurely about him. Of the
same nature,
though less startling, is the satisfaction I take in surprising, or,
better
still, in being surprised by, some more or less ordinary bird at an
extraordinarily
near range. And this is what befell me yesterday. I had been
making
my daily morning round of the Estero, and, having been rewarded by
nothing out
of the common run, was turning city-ward, when I bethought myself, as a
last
resort, to look into one other pool, in which I had occasionally found
something of interest. Here, as throughout the Estero, a goodly number of Western sandpipers were feeding, and near them was a comparatively infrequent and therefore better-appreciated visitor, a single yellow-legs, or telltale. This I saw
at a
glance was of a medium size, neither one thing nor another, as I
expressed it
to myself, so that I was uncertain whether to take it for a small
example of melanoleucus
or a large example of flavipes,
these being two species of the
genus Totanus which
differ only
in the matter of size, showing, so far as I have ever heard, no
appreciable
difference in the way of plumage. The worst
of it was
that the longer I studied the fellow, the worse off I found myself. One
minute it
was large enough for the larger species; the next minute it was small
enough
for the smaller one, which latter, I must confess in the interest of
truth, I
was rather desirous of calling it, since that is much the less common
of the
two on the Pacific coast. As an honest observer, desiring to play fair
with
myself, I was bound to stand on my guard against being influenced by
any such
unscientific consideration. On the
other hand,
however, I reminded myself that I had been looking for the last hour at
hosts
of very small sandpipers, and indeed was looking at them now in this
very pool;
naturally, almost inevitably, therefore, by force of unconscious
comparison, (a
force that I have often found myself laboring under), this larger bird
would
strike me as larger than it really was. Tossed
thus, like a
shuttlecock, between contrary opinions, I felt increasingly foolish, as
a man
sensitive about his standing in his own eyes of necessity will in such
a
predicament, though as a matter of fact I was simply manifesting a
commendable
spirit of scientific caution. If I had been a younger hand at the
business, I
could probably have decided the question on the instant. Given a
certain
measure of inexperience, and certainty is about the easiest thing in
the world.
Why bother one’s head with second thoughts? What a man knows, he knows,
and
there’s an end on lt. Alas, I have found that too often what a man
knows he
doesn’t know; and so with age comes slowness of decision with all its
disagreeable concomitants. At last I
determined
to hear the bird’s voice. That might furnish a clue, though I believed
that the
two species were practically one in this respect also. In any event,
the
experiment was worth trying. I stepped briskly forward, therefore, with
as much
bluster as I could conveniently command on so narrow a stage, expecting
the
bird as a reasonable being to take alarm and make off, giving voice as
it flew.
But even
when I had
come as near it as I could without wading into the black, muddy water,
the
long-legged creature simply stalked a little farther out, and, having
nodded a
few times after its manner, resumed its feeding. “Who’s afraid?” it
seemed to
say. “You’re only fooling.” Well, a
half-minute
or so passed; my glance fell upon a narrow mud-bar, say thirty or forty
feet
from where I stood; and there, directly under my eye, between me and
the
yellow-legs, in open space, stood a splendid black-bellied plover in
elegant
plumage, the lower parts from the chin downward jet-black. Through the field-glass the big fellow was almost in my hand, the second of its kind that I had ever seen in Santa Barbara, and as well as I could remember, the only one I had ever seen anywhere in adult summer dress, the very great majority of autumnal “beetle-heads,” as gunners call them, having the lower parts white, and the upper parts largely gray, whence another of their common names, the “gray plover.” Indeed, I believe it is true that the birds put on their summer garb so late and take it off so early that specimens in really perfect plumage — which even my bird could not be said to wear — are almost never seen so far south as any part of the United States. The thing
was like
a miracle. A moment ago he was not there. I had not seen him arrive,
large as
he was and so near. I had not moved or turned away my head; there was
no cover
from behind which he could have stepped into sight; and now there he
stood,
there on a narrow neck of land, perfectly secure, had he but known it,
but by
no means insensible. His bearing and action proved conclusively that he
had
just alighted. However,
this was
but half the story. The real
miracle was yet to come. From the
first
instant the plover was evidently much disturbed in his mind. Most
likely he had
never before found himself so closely cornered. I think he was as much
surprised to see me as I was to see him. As he came over the Estero,
his eyes
probably fell upon the yellow-legs and small sandpipers feeding so
quietly.
“This is a promising place,” he said to himself; “suppose I drop in.”
And
behold, as his feet touched the mud, here, standing over him, was this
terrible
monster. Nevertheless,
with
all his wavering he held his ground for a few moments, long enough for
me to
scan him again and again from bill to tail. Then, “This will never do,”
he thought;
“high time I was going”; and away he went, sounding that resonant
musical
whistle, so very sweet, alas! in the ears of all the large and
honorable tribe
of shore-bird destroyers; for this “beetle-head,” the prince of
plovers,
breeding on the arctic shores of both continents, wanders at one time
and
another over nearly the whole earth, and wherever he goes, or wherever
men are
sufficiently civilized to enjoy such refined, gentlemanly amusement, he
is
treated as a target. He does well to be wary, the warier the better. I
could
wish that he would never allow a man to come within a mile. So
magnificent and
innocent a creature to be massacred for sport! For a
minute,
possibly, my attention was fastened upon the flying bird and his voice
as he
dwindled out of sight. Then my eyes again rested by chance upon the bar
of mud
— perhaps two rods in length and a foot or two wide — whence he had
flown, and
behold, a second wonder! There stood another bird of pretty much the
same
dimensions and general color, but of a darker shade, and plainly not a
plover. For the
second time
within five minutes I was struck with amazement. By what magic had the
bird got
there, and, far more important, what in the name of ornithology was I
to call
him? His black
bill was
rather stout and somewhat longer than the plover’s, yet still of only
middling
length for a shore-bird of his size. Evidently he did not probe mud for
a
livelihood. His fore neck and upper breast were jet-black, curiously
divided
(“curvingly divided” my pencil put it, with greater exactness) as it
ran down
upon the white breast; and his legs were of a bright orange! To my eye
he was
utterly strange. He had somewhat the look and build of an
oyster-catcher, I
said to myself, though the bill was not long enough nor stout enough,
nor the
bird himself large enough. Certainly he was neither of the
oyster-catchers that
I knew. But there
was a
third one, Frazar’s by name, rare and not rightfully falling within our
limits,
a bird that I had never seen, and had never expected to see, and of
which I
remembered not a word of description. Could the bird before me be by
any
possibility of that species? On all accounts this was most unlikely, or
better
to say, impossible. But if he was not an oyster-catcher, what could he
be? In plain
words, I
was at my wits’ end. The one thing I was sure of was that here was
something
the like of which I had never set eyes on till this minute. Like the
plover he
stayed a brief while, extremely restless, too, like the plover, as he
had
abundant reason to be; and then, as soon as he could pull himself
together, it
seemed, off he went, with harsh cries not in the least resembling the
plover’s
smooth, melodious whistle. What would
turn up
next on the few square feet of that prolific mud-bar, out of which
birds seemed
actually to be born for my delectation and puzzlement? A flamingo,
perhaps. But when I
had
waited long enough, and the age of miracles seemed to be for the time
being
past, I took my way homeward, pondering over what I had seen. Once
there, I had
recourse to the Handbook. My first turn of the leaves was to Frazar’s
oyster-catcher. Nothing fitted. I knew it would be so, I protested to
myself.
The idea was absurd. For one thing, no oyster-catcher would ever be
found in so
unlikely a place. But on the
margin
of the same leaf (so near a shot had I made) under a description of the
ruddy
turnstone I saw written in my own hand, supplying the book’s too
frequent lack,
“Legs bright orange-red.” “Here we have it,” said I; and on reading the
account
of that bird’s juvenile plumage I found my stranger faithfully
portrayed. I had
never seen a
ruddy turnstone before without more or less of those conspicuous,
highly
distinctive, irregularly disposed reddish patches which give the wearer
so odd,
almost clownish, an appearance, as they give it also sundry of its
popular
names, “calico-back,” “checkered snipe,” and “ruddy turnstone.” I had
clean
forgotten those bright-colored legs (“red-legged plover” is another of
the
names it is said to go by), an excusable lapse, I try to persuade
myself, since
I had seen only two such birds (unusual on the Pacific coast, where the
black
turnstone mostly replaces them) in more than twenty years. After all,
as I
consider the matter, I see no great reason to lament this bit of
forgetfulness.
It furnished me with an hour or two of pleasurable excitement, a
thorough
waking-up, of a sort not to be enjoyed every day by any means at my
time of
life. But I
still ask
myself, “How in the world did those birds land, one after the other, at
my very
feet unobserved?” I cannot believe that they sprang into being there
and then,
new-made like Adam out of the dust of the earth, a pitch of faith that
St.
Francis, holy man and greater brother of the birds, would have
experienced no
difficulty in exercising. Perhaps it
would be
enough to say, though such an explanation may sound ludicrously simple
after
all the talk I have made about it, that they happened to drop in while
my eyes
were unconsciously directed elsewhere. It is a common saying among wise
men,
though little in favor with the vulgar, that the simplest explanation
is apt to
be the truest. My
morning’s
adventure brought to mind an incident in no wise connected with
ornithology.
Many years ago I was present with a small company of friends who had
assembled
to hear one of the most widely known of American novelists read a play
which
she had recently completed and was hoping to have presented upon the
stage. She
read it well, with no attempt at that tiresome “accomplishment” known
as
“elocution”; we were all deeply interested; and at the close there was
a
general chorus of praise and hearty congratulation. But a
journalist
and critic of long experience entered one slight objection. If the play
was to
be acted, there must be a change in the opening scene. “As the scene
stands,”
he said, “the heroine is on the stage with others when the curtain
rises. That
will never do. The heroine must have an entrance.” That last
remark
was what my morning’s adventure called to mind. My two birds would have
missed
nine parts of their dramatic effect if, like the yellowlegs, they had
been on
the stage when the curtain rose. They had
an
entrance, and I had the excitement and the wonder of it. I think
nothing more
like wizardry ever happened to me than the appearance of that
turnstone, a very
sizable, sturdily built body, it must be remembered, standing at my
feet where
but an instant before there had been nothing. And after this I think I shall not forget in a hurry that the ruddy turnstone’s legs are of a bright orange color. That bit of knowledge, I flatter myself, is for one while burned in. |